PSU news by
Penn State's student blog

Topics

More

UPUA Judicial Board Voids New Multicultural Caucus Seats

After meeting to evaluate the changes to UPUA’s bylaws and constitution that were passed almost unanimously by the General Assembly last Wednesday, the student government’s Judicial Board elected to overturn the decision.

With the decision to overturn, the three added appointed seats to its Assembly structure — one for each of Penn State’s international/multicultural caucuses: Black Caucus, Latino Caucus, and Asian Pacific Islander Desi American Caucus — have been voided.

The board pinpointed the wording in Policy 02-13, which limits multicultural representative seats to three, and the Steering Committee and Assembly’s role as “arbiters” in adding these Community Representative Seats. 

“This Board takes no pleasure in the decision rendered, and its decision was not a question of principle. However, the facts are clear. As written, Policy 02-13 and Policy 03-13 do not meet the standards of fairness and equity,” the Judicial Board wrote in a per curiam.

The appointed seats came following weeks of lobbying by members and supporters of the three caucuses at Open Student Forum. The motion to add the seats and make the changes to the bylaws was passed with little opposition.

Opposition to the changes focused on the quick manner that these changes were brought to the table, as well as the lack of review for a policy change that wouldn’t come into effect until the next Assembly takes office.

“If this were a resolution or a bill, I would not feel the need to speak; it would be an easy yes vote,” said Zach Robinson, a representative who seats on the ad hoc committee.

“But this is a change to the structure of our organization, and it carries with it many outcomes that we have not fully discussed. Again, even if we pass this right now and applaud our work once we have done so, nothing will happen until April. We have to make sure we do this right to ensure we need not have this discussion again in the future.”

UPUA Justice Daniel Zahn also discussed a constitutional violation in the addition of these seats. 

“It is the sole power of the Judicial Board to decide the effective date of any and all constitutional Amendments and their attached bylaw,” Zahn wrote. “Any attempt by another branch to decide the effective date of constitutional Amendments violates the Constitution and its governing ideals.”

Your ad blocker is on.

Please choose an option below.

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter:
OR
Support quality journalism:
Purchase a Subscription!

About the Author

Steve Connelly

Unfortunately, former editor Steve Connelly has graduated. Where is he now? He might be doing something related to that PR degree he got in 2019. Maybe he finally opened that sports bar named after one of his photos, the Blurry Zamboni. Or he might just be eating chicken tenders and couch surfing. Anything’s possible. If you really want to know, follow him on Twitter @slc2o.

Comments

Other posts by Steve

Penn State Softball’s Season Ends With Big Ten Tournament Loss To Indiana

The Hoosiers made the Penn State defense work and used an aggressive third inning to take the lead and move on in the tournament.

Penn State Softball’s Toni Polk And Chelsea Bisi Earn All-Big Ten Selections

Penn State Softball Gears Up For Return To Big Ten Tournament

March For Our Lives Co-Founder, Penn State Freshman Aims To Bring Political Awareness To New Community

Penn State freshman and March for our Lives co-founder Alex Wind has already made a global impact with his efforts to end gun violence. Now, he’s working to make sure his peers at Penn State are politically aware.

Three Takeaways From Penn State Football’s First Three Games

Penn State’s (potentially) elite defense and inconsistent offense have stood out through three games played this year.

Send this to a friend