What we have now are two different versions of the same story. Both are based on the same facts, yet both draw very different conclusions about Paterno’s role in the scandal. It’s quite possible that the truth is somewhere between the Paterno and Freeh reports, but we’ll never actually find out because we have yet to read a report that doesn’t make broad assertions based on circumstantial evidence. It’s not exactly fair for the Penn State faithful to completely dismiss the Freeh report for editorializing on facts while embracing the Paterno report that used the same facts to show that Paterno didn’t participate in a cover up.
For the juniors and seniors out there, tests like the LSAT, MCAT, and GRE are fast approaching. Luckily, UPUA has your back as next week will be Test Preparation Week.
It's been a tough semester for UPUA so far. Two iPads nearly tore the entire assembly apart, and UPUA's vote against the new CCSG budget was pretty much deemed irrelevant when the budget proposal was passed. Despite the multiple blows, UPUA was able to swing back and have a (relatively) mistake-free week.
The day of reckoning is over for CCSG and its controversial budget proposal. At this afternoon's meeting, the Student Activity Fee Board voted (8-3-1) to recommend a new budget for the Council of Commonwealth Student Governments, which includes the contested $14,800 from the student activity fee at University Park.
The day of reckoning is here for the Council of Commonwealth Student Governments, as the Student Activity Fee Board will meet at 3:30 p.m. in 111 HUB to discuss CCSG's budget proposal that would allocate the student government $14,800 from the University Park student activity fee.
In what has become the UPUA controversy of this semester, the Board of Arbitration has ruled that John Zang followed UPUA policies when purchasing the iPads.